Pathway questions

Level 1 has 4 projects
! = Icebreaker
2 = Writing a speech with purpose
3 = Vocal Variety and Body Language - this has 3 evaluation options: Body Language & Vocal Variety OR Vocal Variety Only OR Body Language Only
4 = Evaluation & Feedback - this has 3 parts: 1 - Deliver a speech and get feedback; 2 Deliver a second speech applying the feedback received; 3 Evaluate someone else's speech (there are 3 evaluation resources for this project.  If an evaluation was given without using the resource, the VPE can check the box for the member)

But isn't it doubled then in the 4th project? Because we are already marking in the bottom in the FTH4 "pathways report card" that we were "Evaluator", which is according to Base Camp the part which is connected with the whole project "Evaluation and Feedback".
Is FTH4 recognizing the roles in the bottom part of the levels when they are taken in the agenda?
If not, than it makes sense to have it at the top, but maybe it can be written more clearly, that the #3 for example is "Being Evaluator".

Best regards
Markus

yes the Pathways report card recognises evaluator, etc
They are allocate on a first come first allocated.

Thank you for the fast answer. And What about my question in the first paragraph?

Pam is the pathways expert.

So again to address Pam's answer before:

But isn't it doubled then in the 4th project? Because we are already marking (or the system marks) in the bottom in the FTH4 "pathways report card" that we were "Evaluator", which is according to Base Camp the part which is connected with the whole project "Evaluation and Feedback". When it is put like that in the system, then in the meeting Agenda I have to choose the "speaker" role, even though I am an Evaluator, to choose the Project in a way like you mentioned.

I think that it should be taken out from the "project" side and mentioned with the role in the bottom as "Evaluator (part of Project "Feedback & Evaluation")". What do you think?

Best regards
Markus

I agree it is doubled up - as per the TI requirements.  The project has 3 parts, but now they've added an evaluation in the enhancements
It is a bit confusing as the evaluator must become a "speaker" to get the evaluation project ticked, or the VPE can confirm the role has been done on the report card
Note that the same applies to Table Topics Master and the Active Listening" project.  

We don't have a way to link evaluation forms to roles other than speeches.  
Add it to the suggestions/improvements forum