Hi Dave. I am "the developers".
Thanks for
mentioning your specific use case as part of your request. It always helps to understand how different clubs use the system and what gaps they encounter regarding features vs how they would like to use it.
There have been a number of requests for evaluator roles to have additional features in the agenda... I would put this request in that category.
There are some fundamental challenges right now with addressing any evaluator specific enhancement requests:
1) The system does not distinguish between evaluators and any other general role. The only "special role" that the agenda supports at this time are speakers... which are called out when you check that an agenda item is a speech.
2) Even if I added the functionality to call out certain roles as evaluators to allow the enabling of special features, I would also have to add the ability for evaluators to be paired with their respective speakers. You might think that the role numbers functionality does that, but it really does not... there is nothing in the system that makes the connection that Evaluator #1 is paired with Speaker #1. You would need that to enable an evaluator to see the
correct Speakers Intro, for example.
I realize that this may seem like I am giving you excuses... This does sound like it would be worth pursuing some version of what you are asking--I think a lot of clubs would benefit from the enhancement. I am just pointing out that this is a case where implementing your request is actually more involved than you may think. That is why it has not been done yet. I have a number of other higher priority, easier to implement enhancements on my backlog. I maintain the system in my limited spare time.